Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Crawford & Slaten Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 27, 1933No. 22393PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

1. Section 3353(2%) of Micliie’s (1926) Code, prescribing the method of foreclosing the liens specified in § 3352 of the same code, makes mandatory “the commencement of an action for the recovery of the amount of his claim within twelve months from the time the same shall become due;” but the requirement of the statute as to the time within which the “action” shall be commenced relates to the action in personam against the contractor, and not to the subsequent proceeding against the landowner. Lombard v. Trustees &c., 73 Ga. 322, 324. See also Buck v. Tifton Mfg. Co., 4 Ga. App. 695, 696 (62…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lombard v. Trustees of the Young Men's Library Ass'n FundSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  2. Buck v. Tifton Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Jordan Company v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Adair Mtg. Co. v. Allied Concrete Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Millers National Insurance Co. v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Crawford & Slaten Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Cowart v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API