Legal Opinion

Martin v. Farrington

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 1986No. 72473PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Banke, Chief Judge.

Appellant Martin filed this direct appeal from the denial of his “Motion to Compel Settlement” of the case in accordance with the purported terms of a settlement agreement reached between the parties prior to trial. The case proceeded to trial on the same day the motion was denied, resulting in a verdict and judgment in favor of the appellee for an amount greater than the amount of the settlement offer. The appellant’s sole enumeration of error is directed to the denial of the motion to compel settlement. The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steele v. Cincinnati Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  2. Blackwell v. CantrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Parish v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whiddon v. StargellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Southwest Health and Wellness, LLC v. WorkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Richardson v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Seaton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Re-Max Executives, Inc. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API