Legal Opinion

Barazzotto v. Intelligent Systems, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1987No. 86 CA 67PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFain, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered by the trial court in favor of the defendants.

Plaintiff-appellant, Richard E. Barazzotto, bought a Cromenco-10 computer system (“C-10 computer”) from defendants-appellees, Intelligent - Systems, Inc. (“I-Systems”) and Ed Stull. The computer system was delivered in installments in February, June and September 1983. In August 1983, Barazzotto bought an Accounting-Plus software package from I-Systems and Stull.

Barazzotto claims that Stull knew Barazzotto was purchasing the Cro-menco-10 to replace a different computer which he had previously…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Williams v. DorseyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Yo-Can, Inc. v. Yogurt Exchange, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Karr-Bick Kitchens & Bath, Inc. v. Gemini Coatings, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Graham Hydraulic Power, Inc. v. Stewart & Stevenson Power, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API