Legal Opinion

Bradbury v. Morrison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 4, 1956No. 36081PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The plaintiffs in error will be referred to as the defendants, and the defendant in error as the plaintiff, they having occupied these respective positions in the trial court.

The plaintiff’s right of action depends upon whether, under the allegations of the petition as originally drawn or under the averments of the petition as finally amended, the defendants are shown to be liable to him for commissions on two1 lots that they themselves sold.

The contract by which the defendant Bradbury originally employed the plaintiff to sell certain lots owned by Bradbury constituted, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Purser v. Rountree & McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Widincamp v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  3. Garfunkel v. ByckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  4. Collier Estate v. MurraySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Barrington v. DunwodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stone v. ReinhardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  2. Holcombe v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Oti Shelf, Inc. v. Schair & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Pfarner v. Poston Realty & Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API