Legal Opinion
United States v. Continental Oil Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 18, 1966No. 8228PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORIE L. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The primary question presented in this action is the construction of a provision in a quitclaim deed from the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, 1 an agency of the United States, to Continental Oil Company, 2 reading as follows:
“Grantee covenants and agrees that in the event Grantee uses the facilities of the said Plancor 882 for extracting toluene from hydroformate within a period of eight (8) years from and after June 1, 1948, Grantee shall and will pay an additional sum of Two Thousand Six Hundred Sixty-five Dollars ($2,665.00) per month for each month or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Goddard v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Hulda Elizabeth Evensen, and Edward Colton Evensen v. Pubco Petroleum Corporation, Formerly Pubco Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- J. T. Majors & Son, Inc. v. Lippert Bros., Inc., Lippert Bros., Inc., Cross-Appellant v. J. T. Majors & Son, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tennessee Consolidated Coal Company and Grundy Coal Company v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Levenson v. MobleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Lewis v. Anchorage Asphalt Paving Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Tenneco Oil Company v. Henry W. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- C. H. Codding & Sons v. Armour And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.