Horton v. Howard

I think that the conclusion reached in the opinion of Judge Hamer is right. The relator in his brief urges six different reasons' for reversing the judgment of the dis-' trict court.

1. The resolution calling the election for the issuance of bonds was adopted by the votes of two of the members of *584the county board, one member voting against it. Mr. Sprague, one of the members voting for it, had removed from the precinct from which he was elected to another precinct in the county, and the relator contends that he was disqualified to vote, and that therefore the resolution was not adopted. The…