Legal Opinion

Jewett v. Boihem

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 2009No. 1071534PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODALL, Justice.

William R. Jewett appeals from a judgment in favor of Lester Boihem in Boi-hem’s action seeking restitution of money he paid Jewett and a company Jewett owned in an aborted business transaction. We affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

This dispute arose out of events that began in approximately December 2005. At that time, Jewett was the sole owner and manager of Accu-Crete, LLC (“the company”). By a “letter of agreement” dated December 21, 2005 (“the letter agreement”), Jewett agreed to sell 50% of the company to Boihem for the sum of $2,000,000. The letter agreement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Jefferson Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Staats v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Philpot v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. New Properties, L.L.C. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  5. Kennedy v. Polar-BEK & Baker WildwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tennille v. Western Union CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  2. Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Priority Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
  3. Roche Diagnostics Corporation v. Priority Healthcare CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2019
  4. Spinesource, Inc. v. DuesingDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2022
  5. Williams v. Federal National Mortgage AssociationDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API