Legal Opinion

Baburam v. Federal Express Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 15, 2016No. 15-CV-5122 (FB)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROANNE L. MANN, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

Currently pending before this Court is a motion filed by plaintiff Heerarem Baburam (“plaintiff’), on June 27, 2016, to reopen fact discovery, which closed on June 8, 2016. See Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (June 27, 2016) (“PI. Motion”), Electronic Case Filing Docket Entry (“DE”) #23. Defendant Federal Express Corporation (“defendant”) objects to reopening discovery, contending that plaintiff “has not stated good cause to modify the [Court’s] scheduling order .... ” Response in Opposition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. GrubmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corporation v. Esprit De Corp. And Federated Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  3. Carlson v. Geneva City School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Aggarwal v. Costco Wholesale CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  2. Al-Anesi v. City Of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
  3. Amy Gile ex rel. minor A.G. v. Town of Windham, et al.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
  4. Canales v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  5. Green v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API