Legal Opinion

Suckenik v. Levitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Greenfield, J.), entered June 19, 1990, which, insofar as appealed from, found, after inquest without a jury, that plaintiff should be awarded damages in the amount of one cent, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The within libel action arose from a letter, dated October 31, 1988, which was written by defendant to a client of plaintiff, an attorney. Since the court’s granting of summary judgment to plaintiff on default was not contested, the only question before us is whether the court properly set damages in the amount of one cent.

We find…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zator v. BuchelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Orlowski v. KoroleskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Taylor v. Brooke Towers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Lino Celle and Radio Mindanao Network Usa, Inc. v. Filipino Reporter Enterprises Inc. And Libertito PelayoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API