Legal Opinion

Cablevision Systems Corp. v. Department of Telecommunications & Energy

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 8, 1998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, C.J.

We have before us, on a reservation and report by a single justice of this court, the appeal of Cablevision *437Systems Corporation (Cablevision), pursuant to G. L. c. 25, § 5, from a decision of the Department of Telecommunications & Energy (department) approving a holding company proposal of the intervener Boston Edison Company (Edison).2 Under G. L. c. 25, § 5, only an “aggrieved party in interest” may appeal from a decision of the department. The department did not grant Cablevision status as a party but did allow it the role of a limited participant. The department and Edison moved to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Ass'n of Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers, Inc. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Save the Bay, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Attorney General v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  4. South Shore National Bank v. Board of Bank IncorporationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  5. Everett Town Taxi v. Board of Aldermen of EverettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cablevision of Boston, Inc. v. Public Improvement CommissionDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
  2. Tofias v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. RicMer Properties, Inc. v. Board of Health of RevereMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  4. Indeck Maine Energy, LLC v. Commissioner of the Division of Energy ResourcesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API