Legal Opinion

United States v. Bridgeford

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 7, 1980No. 35,320; SPCM 12904Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

We granted review to determine whether appellant was properly tried by court-martial. The issue is raised in the following factual context. Appellant voluntarily enlisted in the United States Army Reserve on April 1, 1975, for a period of 6 years. Following a brief period of active duty for training purposes, he was released on October 4, 1975. By order dated August 23, 1976, appellant was ordered to active duty once again, with a reporting date of October 8. That order asserted that its purpose was “to perform involuntary active duty in accordance with Army Regulation…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. BarrazaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API