Legal Opinion

Brenda D. v. Department of Child Safety

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 23, 2017No. 1 CA-JV 16-0277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McMURDIE, Judge:

¶ 1 In this case, we are asked to determine if a parent has “failed to appear” for a termination adjudication hearing within the meaning of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 8-863(C) and Arizona Rule of Juvenile Procedure 66(D)(2), if the parent appeared approximately 26 minutes late. We are also asked to determine if the superior court improperly restricted a parent’s counsel’s participation at the hearing, and violated the parent’s right to be heard by refusing to allow the parent to testify because of tardiness, We hold a parent has not “failed to appear”…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Dombey v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brenda D. v. Dep't of Child SafetyArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. David S. v. Dcs, K.S.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Terrance K. v. Dcs, H.K.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API