Legal Opinion

Henry A. Knott Co. v. Redington Towers, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 4, 1983No. 82-1673PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court struck pleadings and entered a default judgment against both appellants after appellant Henry A. Knott Company failed to comply with discovery orders. We find no merit in the claim that this action was an abuse of discretion as it affects appellant Knott. Watson v. Peskoe, 407 So.2d 954, 956 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Although the sanctions imposed in this case should normally be employed only in extreme circumstances, Hart v. Weaver, 364 So.2d 524 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), the evidence below supports a finding of an “aggravated case of disobedience” which justifies the order entered here.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Travelers Ins. Co. v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  2. Watson v. PeskoeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Hart v. WeaverDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  4. Luca v. Largo Diversified, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Leatherby Insurance Company v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stoner v. VerkadenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. F. Food Co., Inc. v. Hart Properties, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API