Giles v. Austin

The trial was had in this case before the court without a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff below and against the defendant below. The defendant excepted, and brings the case here. The only errors complained of are as follows:

“1. That the judgment is contrary to law, and, under the *617facts presented, should have been in favor of defendant below.

“ 2. That the court erred in admitting evidence at the trial of the case.”

The complaint, therefore, is of errors “occurring at the trial.” To enable this court to review a decision of the trial court “occurring at the trial,” the party…