Legal Opinion

Axel Johnson, Inc. v. Carroll Carolina Oil Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 4, 1998No. 97-1629PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge LUTTIG wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINS and Judge MOTZ joined.

OPINION

LUTTIG, Circuit Judge:

This ease arises on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of four counts of a six-count complaint for want of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

I

Defendant-appellee Carroll Carolina Oil Co., Inc. (“CCO”) owns a Superfund site, certain cleanup costs of which plaintiff-appellant Axel Johnson, Inc. (“Axel”) — -the former operator, either directly or through its predecessors in interest, of petroleum refinery and storage…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Shaw v. Quincy Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. ESAB Group, Inc. v. Centricut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Advance AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  2. Zoroastrian Center & Darb-E-Mehr v. Rustam Guiv FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
  3. Bradley v. RamseyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Christopher Roche Juanita Roche v. Lincoln Property Company Swib Investment Company, and Invesco InstitutionalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. In Re Xe Services Alien Tort LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API