Legal Opinion
Borenstein v. Borenstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is an action by the plaintiff, the former wife and judgment creditor of the defendant David Borenstein, against him and others to set aside certain transfers alleged to have been made in fraud of her rights as such creditor. The plaintiff and the defendant David Borenstein were husband and wife. They resided in New York from the time of their marriage until the plaintiff left her husband and took up her residence in California. In April, 1933, she commenced an action for divorce in the Superior Court of the State of California, county of Los Angeles. The defendant husband was personally…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Little v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 1932
- Borenstein v. BorensteinNew York Supreme Court · 1934
- Borenstein v. BorensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Parker v. BowmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Milton L. Ehrlich, Inc. v. Swiss Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960
- Cohalan v. New York World-Telegram Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1939