Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tetley Tea Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1966No. Appeal, No. 55PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This appeal is taken from the judgment of the lower court which sustained the imposition of franchise tax on the Tetley Tea Company.

The Act of 1889, P. L. 420, as amended, imposes on certain foreign corporations a franchise tax computed as set forth in the Act. Inter alia, a company “organized for manufacturing” receives an exemption to the extent its property is used in, its employees are engaged in and its receipts are incident to manufacturing in Pennsylvania. Act of June 1, 1889, P. L. 420, §21, as amended, 72 P.S. §1871.

Tetley is a New York corporation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Lowry-Rodgers Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Commonwealth v. Berlo Vending Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Philadelphia School District v. Parent Metal Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Commonwealth v. Peerless Paper Specialty, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Solite Corp. v. County of King GeorgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  2. Golden Triangle Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of PittsburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Stewart Honeybee Products, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Pittsburgh Press Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. Babcock Lumber Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API