Legal Opinion

Shields v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 27, 1989No. 88-02964Published

1Opinion of the Court

ALTENBERND, Judge.

Appellant pleaded nolo contendere to the charge of arson in exchange for a guidelines sentence, which was to include probation. At sentencing and without objection, the trial court included restitution to the victims as a condition of probation. The amount of restitution was to be determined at a later hearing. After appellant filed his notice of appeal and without a hearing, the trial court entered an order which set the amount of restitution. Appellant contends this was error, citing section 775.089(6), Florida Statutes (1987); Amison v. State, 504 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2d DCA…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loeb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Amison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. DiersSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. DiersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API