Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Hancock Bank

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 13, 2013No. 5D13-1828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEvander, J.

Appellants, Leslie and Beverly Thompson (the “Thompsons”), appeal an order denying their motion to cancel sale and motion for relief from default and default judgment. On appeal, the Thompsons argue that the trial court erred in granting Hancock Bank’s (“Hancock”) motion for entry of default against the Thompsons *614because they had filed their answer and affirmative defenses to the complaint prior to the court’s order of default. The Thompsons assert that because the trial court’s entry of default judgment was predicated upon the improperly granted order of default, the default judgment must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  2. Chester, Blackburn & Roder, Inc. v. MarcheseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Reicheinbach v. Southeast Bank, NADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Ingaglio v. EnnisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  5. Nasrallah v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sansbury v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Singh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API