Legal Opinion

Alsip Bros. v. Hard, Pearson, Cliye & Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1874PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal. Where plaintiff claimed to recover an amount exceeding $100, which defendants admitted to be due, and at the same time pleaded a counter-claim of $100: Held, that the counter-claim was the amount in controversy; and that no appeal would lie without the certificate of the trial judge. Appeal fvom Winneshiek Circuit Court.

1Per curiam

— The plaintiffs brought this action to recover of defendants a balance due for work and labor performed, and materials furnished, in the erection of a foundry in the town of Decorah, Iowa. The amount claimed is $324.40.

This claim of the plaintiffs is not controverted, but expressly admitted by the defendants, who plead a counter-claim of $100.00, which they ask to have allowed as a credit on the claim of the plaintiffs. The court, on the trial of the cause, allowed defendants the sum of sixty-two dollars on their counter-claim, and rendered judgment for plaintiffs for the balance due.

There…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Benttine v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Madison v. SpitsnogleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Buckland v. Shephard & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API