Legal Opinion

Pasedach v. Auw

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1936No. 23585. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Herrick

Elsie Pasedach and Pearl E. Thiese, appellants, filed their complaint in the circuit court of Cook county against the appellees, Martha H. Auw and Herbert W. Auw, seeking a decree declaring void, on account of fraud and material alteration, a deed made by Nicholas F. Auw, dated August 18, 1934, conveying his homestead at 750 Belden avenue, in Chicago, to the appellants and Martha H. Auw as tenants in common. The appellants and the appellee Herbert W. Auw are the only children of the grantor. Martha H. Auw is the wife of Herbert W. Auw, who is an attorney at law.

The grantor, at the time of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Side Sash & Door Co. v. HechtIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Keuper v. Unknown Heirs of MetteIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Abbott v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hodge v. GilmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Kane v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1947
  2. McKey v. McKeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Douglas Lumber Co. v. Chicago Home for IncurablesIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Krieg v. FelgnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Stowell v. SatoriusIllinois Supreme Court · 1952

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API