Legal Opinion

The Queen v. Ah Hum

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Exceptions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, by

Judd, O.J.

On tbe 15th of July, 1892, the defendant was convicted in the Police Court of Honolulu of violating Section 3, Chapter 41, Laws of 1886, by managing or conducting or assisting in the managing or conducting-of a lottery known as Che Ea, on the 10th of July last. He appealed, and on the 23d of February last he moved the Circuit Court, First Circuit, to dismiss the charge made against him on the ground that there is no law in force under which he can be prosecuted. The motion was overruled by Judge "Whiting, presiding, and exceptions thereto are now brought to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. ReisingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Commonwealth v. DesmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. BunnHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. DominguesHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. YoungHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. AnchetaHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API