Legal Opinion

Bowens v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 10, 2005No. A05A1541PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bernes, Judge.

We granted Andrew Bowens’ application for discretionary review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence of cocaine taken from his person after a drug sniffing dog alerted on the exterior of his vehicle during the course of a valid traffic stop. Bowens concedes that the use of a drug sniffing dog to conduct a free air search around the exterior of a vehicle during the course of a lawful traffic stop does not implicate the Fourth Amendment under the United States Constitution. See Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U. S. 405 (125 SC 834, 160 LE2d 842) (2005). He…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Rosas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sommese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Souder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Dominguez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API