Legal Opinion

Furness v. Union National Bank

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. George Deiggs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman

As to the suggestion-by appellants that the executory agreement made February 15, 1890, having been signed by them only, is not binding upon them, it may be said that if the agreement had never been acted upon and application were now made to compel appellants to adhere to the consent they then gave, the court might well hesitate about enforcing the promise thus made. Such is not the question presented to this court. The agreement has been acted upon, large sums of money have been paid out thereon, the situation of the parties has been materially changed inconsequence of such agreement, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re BatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. West v. Bank of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1847
  3. Brown v. Merchant's & Farmers Nat. BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. Citizens' Bank v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  5. Williams v. Importers & Traders National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lady Ensley Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. ShawAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
  2. Levy v. Chicago National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  3. Farwell v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Kittredge v. NicholesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API