Legal Opinion

Culbreath v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 14, 1995No. CR-94-291PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, Kenneth H. Culbreath, was convicted of the crime of stalking his former wife, a violation of § 13A-6-90, Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced seven years in the penitentiary.

I

The appellant initially contends that Alabama's stalking statute is unconstitutional because, he says, it is vague and overbroad. Section 13A-6-90, defines the crime of stalking as follows:

"A person who intentionally and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and who makes a credible threat, either express or implied, with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear of death or serious…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. CaffeyIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Streater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. State v. OrselloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Luplow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API