Legal Opinion

Dreyfus v. Otis

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion to vacate order of arrest.

1Opinion of the Court

On argument of the motion the following memorandum was filed December 10, 1877:

Lawrence, J.

If Otis was not a partner of Lagrave, the plaintiff has no cause of action against him. The allegation that the defendants were partners is made by the plaintiffs on information and belief, and the sources of such information and belief are not stated.

The subsequent allegations on which the order of arrest is founded are, that the defendants, through Lagrave, committed *406the fraudulent acts complained of. It has always been held that an affidavit for obtaining an arrest is defective in stating the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Covington Drawbridge Company v. ShepherdSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kaeppler v. Red River Valley National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Markey v. DiamondNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892
  3. Flatow v. Von BremsenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1890
  4. Markey v. DiamondCity of New York Municipal Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API