Legal Opinion

Dexter Hillocks v. Attorney General United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 12, 2019No. 17-2384PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Dexter Anthony Hillocks is a lawful permanent resident who was convicted of the Pennsylvania state crime of using a communication facility- i.e. , a phone-to facilitate a felony. The question before us is whether that crime constitutes either an "aggravated felony" or a "conviction relating to a controlled substance" under federal immigration laws. Either would make him removable.

Typically, when deciding whether a particular state crime falls into those categories, the immigration courts look to see if the statute matches the federal definition of a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Michael PortanovaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  2. Luis Grijalva Martinez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Lazaro Larios v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  4. LAGUERREBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
  5. Srecko Pesikan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API