Dexter Hillocks v. Attorney General United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Dexter Anthony Hillocks is a lawful permanent resident who was convicted of the Pennsylvania state crime of using a communication facility- i.e. , a phone-to facilitate a felony. The question before us is whether that crime constitutes either an "aggravated felony" or a "conviction relating to a controlled substance" under federal immigration laws. Either would make him removable.
Typically, when deciding whether a particular state crime falls into those categories, the immigration courts look to see if the statute matches the federal definition of a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Moncrieffe v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Michael PortanovaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Luis Grijalva Martinez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Lazaro Larios v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- LAGUERREBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2022
- Srecko Pesikan v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.