Legal Opinion
Adams v. Ross Amusement Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 29, 1935No. 33312PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOURNET, Justice.
William H. Adams filed suit against the Ross Amusement Company, Inc., a foreign corporation, for the sum of $3,540, and, for the purpose of jurisdiction, attached personal property alleged to belong to defendant.
On April 21, 1934, Hal J. Ross and Jane Shannon, nonresidents, appeared by intervention, claiming to be owners of the property attached, and prayed that they be permitted to bond the property, and ruled Adams into court to show cause why they should not be ■decreed to be the owners of tbe property, and the attachment dismissed.
On the 23d day of April, 1934, Adams…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Andrews v. SheehySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Godchaux v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Chapman v. IrwinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Dawson v. FrazarSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- McAlpin v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mexic Bros., Inc. v. SauviacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Standard Indemnity, Inc. v. AlbroughtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Provenza v. ProvenzaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1947
- Warren v. De ArmasLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Green v. Provencal Tie MillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.