Legal Opinion

Martha Kane v. . Edward Graham Haywood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1872PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It appearing, to the satisfaction of the Court, from the report of the clerk, that EDWARD GRAHAM HAYWOOD, one of the attorneys of the Court, had, as attorney for Mrs. Martha Kane, received the sum of $4,496.22, and from the affidavit of Mrs. Kane, that he had after repeated solicitations, failed to account for and pay the same over to her:

On motion of Moore Gatling and Phillips Merrimon, attorneys for Mrs. Kane, a rule was granted in the first named case on Col. Haywood to pay the said balance of $4,496.22 into Court.

This rule was made returnable on the 4th day of January, 1872.

At the return…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McCownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. In Re Northwestern Bonding Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Hendryx v. FitzpatrickU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
  4. Sinsheimer v. SimonsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
  5. State Ex Rel. Solicitor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API