Legal Opinion

Tocker v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1963No. 3213PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MYERS, Associate Judge.

A customer- appeals from a directed verdict for appellee at the conclusion of her case in which she sought to recover damages, both compensatory and punitive, for .alleged slander, false arrest and wrongful ■detention.

The errors charged were rulings by the -trial judge (1) that the words spoken by the store employee were not slanderous per .se, viz., that they did not charge her with a crime involving moral turpitude and did not accuse her of an act punishable by law, and (2) that stopping her on the public street did not constitute false imprisonment. 1

The record…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington Annapolis Hotel Co. v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
  2. Gelhaus v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  3. United Cigar Stores Co. v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1911

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Michael McCarthy Arthur Waskow v. Richard G. KleindienstCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  2. Marshall v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. District of Columbia v. ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  5. Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API