Legal Opinion
Nair v. Thaw
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 9, 1968PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.
The parties own and occupy residences in an AA residence zone on opposite sides of Brook-side Place in West Hartford. The defendant’s residence cost in excess of $300,000. It is equipped with various machinery and equipment of the most modern and advanced design, including a glass-enclosed swimming pool and an elaborate air-conditioning system, which alone cost approximately $46,000. Most of the machinery and equipment serving the residence is located in a room the dimensions of which are approximately ten feet by twelve feet. Immediately in front of this room but in a separate structure one…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brockett v. JensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Nailor v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Cyr v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Hurlbut v. McKoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Whitney v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1851
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Cummings v. TrippSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Manning v. MichaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.