Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Truck Insurance Exchange v. Schuenemann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 12, 1965No. 14337Published

1ConcurrenceMurray, Chief Justice

I concur in the result arrived at by the ■majority upon appellant’s motion for a re-Tiearing. While I believe that it was the ■intention of the Legislature to render parol gifts of motor vehicles void, or at least voidable, Art. 1436-1, §§ 33, 44, 46, 51, 52 and 53, Vernon’s Ann.Penal Code, yet under certain conditions such a parol gift may in equity be declared valid, and the facts here show this parol gift to be an exception to the general rule. No one with a justiciable interest in this gift is endeavoring to set it aside. Furthermore, Rauel Roberto Diaz, deceased, was in open, exclusive,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Davis v. DouglasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Henderson v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API