BD. OF SUP'RS, ETC. v. Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
448 So.2d 917 (1984)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF LAMAR COUNTY
v.
HATTIESBURG COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY.
No. 54412.
Supreme Court of Mississippi.
January 18, 1984.
William E. Andrews, III, Barbara Bond Parker, Temple, Hudson, Jordan & Gamble, Purvis, for appellant.
R.W. Heidelberg, J. Thomas Dale, Heidelberg, Sutherland & McKenzie, Hattiesburg, for appellee.
En Banc.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
BROOM, Presiding Justice, for the Court:
Tax exempt status of property of a corporation, Hattiesburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co., (Coca-Cola herein), and the constitutionality of the claimed exemption is chief issue here.…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Lee; Concurrence · Lee; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Albritton v. City of WinonaMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- City of Jackson v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- Ex Parte DennisMississippi Supreme Court · 1976
- Mississippi Milk Commission v. VanceMississippi Supreme Court · 1961
- Craig v. North Mississippi Community HospitalMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Stockstill v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Choctaw Maid Farms, Inc. v. HaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Mauldin v. BranchMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.