Legal Opinion

General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 27, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

A motion to appeal was sustained in this proceeding wherein judgment for $1200 went against the appellant.

We invoke against the appellee the penalties prescribed by RCA 1.260(c) for his failure to file a brief. It is noted that an extension of time for filing of appellee’s brief was granted, but no brief was filed within the time as extended.

RCA 1.260(c) provides:

“If the appellee fails to file his brief within the time allowed, the Court may:(1) Accept the appellant’s statement of the facts and issues as correct; or (2) reverse the judgment if appellant’s brief reasonably…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleaver v. CleaverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API