Legal Opinion

Town of Bethlehem v. Tucker

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 1979No. 79-125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes before us on an agreed statement of facts and raises the question whether a successful applicant for á zoning variance is entitled to notice of an abutter’s appeal to the superior court that ultimately results in a court order vacating the variance and requiring the applicant to restore the land to its original condition. We hold that notice is required.

On May 6,1976, defendants Martin and Diane Tirrell were granted a variance by the Town of Bethlehem Board of Adjustment that allowed them to place a mobile home on the land of George E. Tucker, III, the other defendant. An…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Royer v. State Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. State v. HessSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. LeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. In re MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. Petition of ClarkSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Sweet v. JEMEZ SPRINGSNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. State v. Village of Jemez Springs, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API