Legal Opinion

Nash v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 1990No. WD 42344Published

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is a direct appeal from an order dismissing a Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Movant, Donald B. Nash, was convicted of burglary, first degree, in violation of § 569.160, RSMo 1978 and forcible rape, in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1978. His convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, State v. Nash, 621 S.W.2d 319 (Mo.App.1981).

Movant presents two points, charging the hearing court erred in dismissing his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing and in failing to enter findings of fact and conclusions of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. NashMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Miller v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API