First Homestead Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Henry
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
This court has issued, ex proprio motu, an order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as premature due to the absence of a signed judgment in the record. Both appellee and appellant have filed briefs responding to the show cause order.
Trial on the merits of this matter was held on January 9, 1985. At the conclusion of trial, the court gave oral reasons for judgment. Although the record contains what purports to be written reasons for judgment dated March 19, 1985, it does not contain a written judgment. Nor are the written reasons of March 19, 1985 consistent with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bordelon v. DauzatLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Fisher v. RollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Dumas v. JetsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Hughes v. HughesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
- Inge v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by5 opinions
- Scarborough v. DukeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- FIRST HOMESTEAD FED. SAV. & LOAN ASS'N v. HenryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Ladnier v. VillafrancoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- First Homestead Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HenrySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Tillman v. DavidsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987