Legal Opinion

Pharr v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff's intestate was a brakeman in the employment of the defendant's lessee, the Southern Railway Company, at the time he is alleged to have been killed by the negligence of (419) the latter. A freight train on its way from Spencer to Charlotte had reached a point on the line of the lessee's railway, called "The Junction," and it was the duty of the intestate at that place to uncouple the train between cars 20 and 21 for the purpose of having the cars of the rear section transferred to another track. In order to do so, it was necessary for the engineer to move the train back and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. State v. . Harvey PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Lewis v. . FountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Albertson v. . TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Gardiner v. . MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Coharie Lumber Co. v. BuhmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. State v. . WatkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API