Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Ralston Purina Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 25, 1972No. 56612Published

1Opinion of the Court

DONNELLY, Judge.

This case was transferred to this Court by the St. Louis Court of Appeals. (Bayer v. Ralston Purina Company, Mo.App., 463 S.W.2d 546.)

Agnes Bayer, the owner of a registered Appaloosa horse, seeks damages for the taking of a photograph of her horse and the subsequent use of that photograph in defendant’s advertisements without her permission. A verdict of $5000 was returned by the jury. The trial court sustained defendant’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff appeals from that action. Defendant asks that we remand with directions to enter judgment for defendant.

The facts are not…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barber v. Time, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  2. Bailey v. Interstate Airmotive, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Munden v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Fay Young and Forrest Young v. That Was the Week That Was A/K/A Tw-3Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
  5. Kegan v. Park BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API