Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tanso

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 14, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.

The defendant, Paul Tanso, appeals from two convictions of murder in the first degree. The main issue on appeal is the trial judge’s admission in evidence, over objection, of the deposition testimony of an unavailable witness who had not been cross-examined. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we conclude that the defendant did not waive his right to cross-examine the witness. Therefore, the admission of the deposition testimony violated the defendant’s right to confrontation under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to a new trial.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Commonwealth v. HaasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MilesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. ForteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. MontezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. DiBenedettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. DiBenedettoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API