Legal Opinion
The Astral
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 16, 1905No. 58PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Admiralty. Suit in rem by seaman to recover damages for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The libelant was a seaman on board the bark Astral during a voyage from Honolulu to Philadelphia, .and has proceeded in rem against the ship to recover damages for injuries suffered by reason of the master’s neglect of duty. The cause of action is thus set forth in the libel:
“That during the said voyage, on or about the 5th day of May, A. D. 1904, at about 7:30 o’clock a. in., when the vessel was about ten days out from Honolulu, the libelant was on deck performing his duties, and was approached by Charles Rock, first officer, and was accused by him of being…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Scarff v. . MetcalfNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- The Marion ChilcottDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1899
- The Lizzie BurrillDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cain v. Alpha SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- The Sallie IonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1907