Legal Opinion
Union Pacific Railroad v. United Transportation Union
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 12, 1992No. 8:CV91-00392PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STROM, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company (hereinafter “Union Pacific”) and defendants United Transportation Union (hereinafter “United”) and Kent Madison’s cross-motions for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 12 and 13). Union Pacific filed this action pursuant to 45 U.S.C. § 153, First (q), seeking to review and set aside an arbitration award. United and Madison filed a counterclaim, seeking enforcement of the same arbitration award. Jurisdiction of the Court is premised upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1337.
The facts underlying…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Union Pacific Railroad v. SheehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Stead Motors of Walnut Creek v. Automotive MacHinists Lodge No. 1173, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Exxon Shipping Company v. Exxon Seamen's UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United Transportation Union, Also Known as C & T, Also Known as Utu Kent H. MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Union Pacific Railroad v. United Transportation UnionDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1993
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. United Transportation Union, Also Known as C & T, Also Known as Utu Kent H. MadisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993