Legal Opinion

Hayois v. Salt River Valley Canal Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1903No. Civil No. 795PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District in and for the County of Maricopa. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtDatis, J.

This was an action brought by the appellee corporation against E. Hayois and seventeen other defend*288ants, owning lands lying under the Salt River Yalley Canal, in Maricopa County, to enjoin and restrain said defendants from entering upon said canal, interfering with the headgates therein, or in any manner obstructing the appellee in the operation and management of its said canal and headgates. The complaint set forth by formal averments the ownership and possession of said canal in the plaintiff; that said canal was an irrigating ditch, used and occupied by the plaintiff for the sole purpose…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gill v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Gould v. Maricopa Canal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API