Roach v. Dozier
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff in error relies on the doctrine of law announced in the “turntable” or attractive nuisance cases. Originally, such doctrine applied to children of tender years and dealt with appliances, machinery or situations which were of such nature as to be almost inherently dangerous when children played upon them or became involved. That doctrine is not applicable under the facts of this case. It has been repeatedly held that the principle of the doctrine will not be extended. Dawley v. Sheridan-Punaro Co., 93 Ga. App. 696, 699 (92 S. E. 2d 613). Cases involving the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mills v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Wallace v. MatthewsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Dawley v. Sheridan-Punaro Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. BrackinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
- JOHNSON v. AVIS RENT a CAR SYSTEM, LLC (Two Cases)Supreme Court of Georgia · 2021
- Chester v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Brooker v. El Encino Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Butler v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.