State Council of the Junior Order of United American Mechanics v. National Council of the Junior Order of United American Mechanics of North America
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On final hearing on bill, answer and proofs. For previous litigation in this state between the parties, see National Council of Jr. 0. U. A. M. v. State Council of Jr. O. U. A. M., 6'1 N. J. Eq. (19 Dick.) 170; S. C. on appeal, 66 N. J. Eq. (M Dick.) J$9.
1Opinion of the Court
Pitney, Y. C.
The questions presented for consideration and decision are of great importance to the parties and somewhat novel in character and not easy of solution. They have been argued with marked ability and complete thoroughness by counsel on each side, both orally and in writing, and have received careful consideration.
I say they are important to the parties, because they involve the very life and right to exist on the part of the complainant.
It was, indeed, at first suggested by the defendant that the defeat of the complainant on the merits in this cause did not necessarily involve such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- International Committee of Young Women's Christian Ass'n v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- McFadden v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Derry Council No. 40 v. State CouncilSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brown v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Council of Jewish Women v. Boston Section Council of Jewish WomenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Burrell v. MichauxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Harker v. McKissockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
- Harker v. McKissockNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.