Legal Opinion

Santana-Rosa v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 9, 2003No. 02-2512PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONSOR, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Appellant Domingo Santana Rosa (“Santana Rosa”), a prisoner in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico, was attacked and badly injured by another inmate wielding a tool referred to as a “sweeping brush.” He brought suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., anchoring jurisdiction on 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The district court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment based, inter alia, on the discretionary function…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Berkovitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Michael Rinaldi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  2. Simeon Palay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Consolidated LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
  4. Kevin Walker v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
  5. Sledge v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API