Legal Opinion

Alicea v. Suffield Poultry, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 17, 1989No. Civ. A. No. 85-0461-FPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FREEDMAN, Chief Judge.

This is a case filed by a group of past and present employees of defendant Suf-field Poultry d.b.a. Royal Harvest Foods (hereinafter “Royal Harvest”) against Royal Harvest and their Union, United Food and Commercial Workers’ Union, AFL-CIO, Local No. 1459 (hereinafter “the Union”). The suit against the employer alleges a violation of the governing Collective Bargaining Agreement (hereinafter “CBA”) resulting in Royal Harvest terminating the workers after they staged a wildcat strike for this perceived violation. Plaintiffs’ claims against their Union…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hiram Alicea v. Suffield Poultry, Inc., D/B/A Royal Harvest FoodsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API