Robel v. Roundup Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentBridge, J.
(dissenting in part) —The incidence of harassment and discrimination in the workplace is terrifying and real. Its occurrence is remediable at law. The remedy, however, must be applied against those truly culpable for the injury caused. Our case law precedent is clear that an employer is not responsible for resolving issues between employees in conflict—no matter how hurtful to the putative victim of the conflict. An employer becomes liable when he or she participates through an identifiable agent or takes no action in the face of repeated harassment which is attributable to a protected…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Grimsby v. SamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Dicomes v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.