Strong v. Schaffer
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Raymond L. Diiaman, Judge. Action by Maude Strong, against Sebastian Schaffer and others, for damages • from sale of intoxicating liquors to. plaintiff’s husband. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal. (2) To point two. of the opinion, Appellants cited: Campbell v. Joímson, 25 S. D. 458; 'Sec. 2849, Pol. 'Code.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Circuit Court, Brown County. Hon. Raymond L. Diiaman, Judge. Action by Maude Strong, against Sebastian Schaffer and others, for damages • from sale of intoxicating liquors to. plaintiff’s husband. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendants appeal. (2) To point two. of the opinion, Appellants cited: Campbell v. Joímson, 25 S. D. 458; 'Sec. 2849, Pol. 'Code. (5) To point five of the opinion, Appellants cited: Bellison v. Apland (Iowa) 89 N. W. 22. Respondent cited: Pol. Code, Secs. 2839, 2844, 2849; Kennedy v. Garrigan, 23 S. D. 265; Dickmann v.…
1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.
Defendants. Schaffer Bros, were saloon keepers. As such they gave bonds under the provisions of section 2839, P- C. The other defendant, a surety company, was the surety on such bonds from July 1, 1913, until after the commencement of this action, which was in May, 1915. Plaintiff sought to recover om such bonds damages which she claimed to have suffered through the sale of intoxicating liquors to her husband, Leon Strong, by Schaffer Bros. In trial court there were verdict and judgment for plaintiff. From such judgment, and an order denying a new trial, all the defendants appealed. '
[1]…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kennedy v. GarriganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Werner v. EdmistonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- League v. EhmkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Dickmann v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Friend v. DunksMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hulm v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Strong v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917