Purdue Pharma L.P., et al. v. Amanda Morales
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion
ihe Court directs Appellee Furdue Pharma LF. to respond to Appellant's DOCUMENT motion by March 6, 2026. Appellee need not submit a fully briefed WCECTRGKIGATLY FILED response. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the Doc #: motion at ECF No. 40 and to mail this Endorsement to the pro se DATE FILED: 2/20/2026 Appellant at the address listed on ECF. co ORDERED: Dated: February 20, 2026. _ CLer —, White Plains, NY United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Purdue Pharma L.P.,st al. Chapter 11 PURDUE PHARMA L.P., P.F. LABORATORIES,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.